What’s the C# equivalent of C++

In C++ the standard does not provide a way for a program to get any details of the exception when the ellipsis is used to catch all errors.

Yes, a (1) catch all is better than (2) catching specific errors without a catch all but (3) catching specific errors followed by a catch all is best.

0

theLizard14y ago

There are times when a catch all is better than testing for a specific exception type where you may end up with access violations or other catastrophic failures that may not be anticipated.

0

Vulpes14y ago

No change to try/catch in C++11 (as it's now called) AFAICS :(

0

Sam Hobbs14y ago

Also, as Mamta said in your previous thread, it is better to provide an instance of the Exception class for the C# catch statement. This makes the C# way better than the C++ way since in C++ (catch with an ellipsis) there is no way of determining what the exception is. Hopefully that is improved in the latest C++ language standard; I have not looked.

0

Vulpes14y ago

This question was answered perfectly by Mamta, when you asked it before.

0

Satyapriya Nayak14y ago

Hi Manish,

http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/Forums/Thread/151135/which-was-a-catch-all-statement-for-any-possible-exception.aspx

http://www.coolinterview.com/interview/41547/

Thanks

0