this is a line from msdn which i could not understand as there was not examle pls give one example
Methods that start an asynchronous operation but do not return an awaitable type should not have names that end with "Async", but may start with "Begin", "Start", or some other verb to suggest this method does not return or throw the result of the operation.
Jack AbroyPosted Jul 7, 2025, 10:06 AM
Start with
asyncor use verbs likefetchloadorgetfor clarity e.gfetchDataAsyncDeepika SawantPosted Jul 6, 2025, 1:41 PM
In .NET, methods that perform asynchronous operations typically return an
awaitabletype likeTaskorTask. These methods should end withAsyncto indicate they can be awaited.However, if a method starts an asynchronous operation but does not return a
TaskorTask, then it should not end withAsync. Instead, it should use verbs likeBegin,Start, etc., to indicate that it kicks off an operation but doesn’t give you a way to await or capture the result directly.Example:
// This method starts an async operation but does NOT return a Task
public void BeginDownloadFile(string url)
{
// Starts a background download using a timer, thread, or event-based pattern
WebClient client = new WebClient();
client.DownloadFileAsync(new Uri(url), "file.txt");
}
It starts an async operation (
DownloadFileAsync) but doesn’t return aTask, so it’s namedBeginDownloadFileinstead ofDownloadFileAsync.The Right Way to Use
AsyncExample :
// This method returns a Task and can be awaited
public async Task DownloadFileAsync(string url)
{
using HttpClient client = new HttpClient();
var data = await client.GetByteArrayAsync(url);
await File.WriteAllBytesAsync("file.txt", data);
}
It returns a
Task, usesawait, and follows the naming convention.